legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Bulmer v. Carter
Appellant, the assignee of a judgment and a contractual claim, sued an attorney and his law firm for conspiracy and other causes of action arising from their representation of a client in the allegedly fraudulent transfer of a business. The trial court sustained a demurrer to these claims and dismissed respondents from the action. On appeal, appellant argues his conspiracy claim was not subject to the petitioning requirements of Civil Code section 1714.10 and his complaint stated a valid cause of action for interference with prospective economic advantage. Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale