legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re K.S.
K.S. appeals from an order of wardship pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 upon a finding that he committed a petty theft, a misdemeanor (Pen. Code, 484, subd. (a)). He contends: (1) there is insufficient evidence to sustain the finding he committed the theft; (2) leading questions were impermissibly used to support the finding; (3) the juvenile court abused its discretion when it rejected the recommendation for probation pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 725, subdivision (a); (4) the court erred when it set a maximum period of confinement; and (5) one of the conditions of probation is unconstitutionally vague. For reasons stated in the opinion, Court strike the maximum period of confinement and in all other respects affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale