P. v. Daniels
Defendant appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of three counts of robbery and found firearm enhancement allegations to be true. Appellant contends her due process rights were violated because eyewitness identifications made at trial were tainted by an impermissibly suggestive field show up. Appellant also contends there was insufficient evidence identifying her as one of the persons who robbed the victims. Court reject each of her contentions.
Comments on P. v. Daniels