Preston v. Sasco Electric
In this action for employment discrimination and wrongful termination, plaintiff Ronald Preston alleged that he had been harassed, discriminated and retaliated against, and wrongfully discharged by his employer, defendant Sasco Electric (SASCO), and his supervisor, defendant Kevin Kincaid. The superior court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment based on the untimeliness of plaintiff's claim and on the insufficiency of the evidence of intentional discrimination. On appeal, plaintiff challenges the court's evaluation of the evidence, its factual inferences, and its legal conclusions with respect to all of the causes of action. Court agree with plaintiff that triable issues exist in this lawsuit. Accordingly, Court must reverse the judgment.
Comments on Preston v. Sasco Electric