legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Solorio
Maria Solorio appeals from her conviction of one count of grand theft of personal property (Pen. Code, 487, subd. (a); all further statutory references are to the Penal Code). She argues the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction, the special enhancement was barred by the statute of limitations, and the victim restitution order is improper. Court find sufficient evidence to support the conviction. On this record, a preponderance of the evidence establishes that the enhancement is not barred by the statute of limitations because the prosecution was commenced within four years of discovery of appellants crime. Court find no abuse of discretion in the amount of restitution ordered.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale