legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Alexis J.
Nancy J. appeals a judgment of the juvenile court terminating her parental rights to her minor children Alexis J. and Arturo J. (together the minors) under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] Nancy contends that the court erred by summarily denying her section 388 petition for modification, in which she sought to have the court vacate the selection and implementation hearing and order six more months of services, or return the minors to her custody. She also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court's finding that the beneficial parent-child relationship exception of section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A) did not apply to preclude terminating her parental rights. Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale