P. v. Suderman
Michael Edwin Suderman, Jr., appeals from a judgment entered after he pleaded no contest to two counts of second degree burglary, (Pen. Code, 459, 460, subd. (b))[1]and one count of receiving stolen property ( 496, subd. (a)). His counsel on appeal has filed an opening brief that asks this court to conduct an independent review of the record as is required by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Counsel also informed appellant that he had the right to file a supplemental brief on his own behalf. Appellant declined to file such a brief.
On November 29, 2005, appellant entered a bank and tried to cash a fraudulent check. A teller identified the check as fraudulent and seized it. Appellant fled. Court conclude there are no arguable issues within the meaning of People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436. (See also People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106.) The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Suderman