P. v. Gergis
Peter Gergis appeals the judgment (order of commitment) entered following a court trial at which he was determined to be a mentally disordered offender (MDO). (Pen. Code,[1] 2962 et seq.) He contends the trial court erred in concluding that his controlling offense of receiving stolen property ( 496, subd. (a)) involved the use of force or violence as required by section 2962, subdivision (e)(2)(P). Court agree and, accordingly, reverse.
Comments on P. v. Gergis