In re Kao S.
The court readjudged appellant, Kao S., a ward of the court (Welf. & Inst. Code,
602)[1]after it sustained allegations charging Kao with lying to police officers (Pen. Code, 148, subd. (a)(2)) and violating his probation ( 777). On December 12, 2006, the court set Kaos maximum term of confinement at six years six months and committed him to the Probation Youth Facility for one year. On appeal, Kao contends the court erred: 1) in calculating his maximum term of confinement; and 2) by its failure to declare the character of his burglary offense. Court find merit to these contentions and remand to the trial court for further proceedings. In all other respects, Court affirm.
Comments on In re Kao S.