legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Delacruz
Defendant Eddie Delacruz (defendant) appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, of one count of kidnapping for carjacking (Pen. Code, 209.5, subd. (a));[1] one count of second degree robbery ( 211); one count of evading an officer (Veh. Code, 2800.2); and one count of misdemeanor hit and run driving (Veh. Code, 20002, subd. (a).) Defendant contends his conviction must be reversed because the trial court committed prejudicial error by denying a Pitchess[2] motion for discovery of personnel records of the officers involved in defendants arrest, by excluding evidence concerning the victims prior misdemeanor conviction for soliciting prostitution, and by denying defendants motion for a mistrial predicated on an unsolicited statement by the victim after his testimony had concluded. Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale