legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Geluz v. Richards
On November 30, 2006, following a bench trial, the trial court issued a tentative decision finding in favor of plaintiffs Eduardo and Dulce Geluz on a cause of action seeking specific performance of a contract. Pursuant to this decision, defendants Charles and Maria Richards were ordered to convey to plaintiffs their interest in certain real property upon plaintiffs payment of $51,121.10. The tentative decision directed plaintiffs to prepare a proposed statement of decision but noted that if plaintiffs failed to comply with the time limitations of California Rules of Court, rule 232 (now rule 3.1590), the tentative decision would be deemed the courts statement of decision. The appeal is dismissed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale