P. v. Dalporto
Defendant Paul Dalporto appeals from a judgment convicting him of misdemeanor vandalism, a lesser included offense of the charged felony vandalism. He contends the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury sua sponte on the lesser included offense of tampering with a vehicle and on the requirement of jury unanimity. Although we agree with his first contention, we deem the error harmless, and Court disagree with the second contention. Court therefore affirm the conviction.
Comments on P. v. Dalporto