In re A.R.
On February 6, 2007, after a contested Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing, the juvenile court terminated the parental rights of appellant, Dawn R., to her children A.R., Cristina R., and F.R. On appeal, Dawn R. contends the juvenile court erred in failing to apply exceptions for termination of parental rights where the children would benefit from continuing the relationship ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(A)) and termination of parental rights would substantially interfere with sibling relationships ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(E)).[2] Dawn R. further argues that having a caregiver who is not a member of her own tribe undermines the intent of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA; 25 U.S.C. 1901, et seq.). The order terminating parental rights is affirmed.
Comments on In re A.R.