legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Jada W.
Defendant and Appellant H.W. appeals from an order of the juvenile court finding him to be the alleged father of Jada W. He contends that the juvenile court abused its discretion when it found him to be the alleged father rather than the presumed father. Defendant J.S. (Mother) also filed a notice of appeal; however, she agrees with the juvenile court that the evidence showed H.W. to be an alleged father. Court therefore dismiss her appeal, find her to be a respondent in H.W.s appeal, and deem her appellants opening brief to be a respondents brief. Finding no error or abuse of discretion, Court affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale