legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re David T.
Following a contested jurisdictional hearing, the juvenile court sustained a subsequent petition alleging the 17 year old minor David T. was within the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. The petition contained allegations he had committed a forcible lewd act against a child under the age of 14, forcible rape, attempted penetration with a foreign object, assault with intent to commit rape, petty theft, false imprisonment by force or menace, and forcible rape in concert. The court committed the minor to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Facilities, for a maximum confinement period of nine years, not to exceed the age of 25.
On appeal, the minor contends: (1) statements were admitted against him in violation of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694]; (2) assault with intent to commit rape, forcible rape, and false imprisonment are lesser included offenses of rape in concert; and (3) the commitment order incorrectly states the maximum confinement period.
Court reverse the findings sustaining assault with intent to commit rape and forcible rape, order the juvenile court to correct the commitment order, and otherwise affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale