P. v. Salido
Appellant Rigoberto Salido appeals his conviction by jury of three counts of second degree robbery. (Pen. Code, 211.)[1] The trial court sentenced him to seven years in state prison. Salido contends that the trial court violated his constitutional rights by admitting statements Salido made to law enforcement officers (Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436), by admitting a statement that Salido's co-defendant made to officers (Crawford v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36), and by imposing an upper term on count three based on aggravating facts not found by the jury. (Cunningham v. California(2007) U.S. [127 S.Ct. 856].) Court conclude that the court erred by imposing only one $20 court security pursuant to section 1465.8. Court otherwise affirm.
Comments on P. v. Salido