legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ripley
Defendant appeals his prison sentence following a conviction for possession for sale of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, 11378) and residential burglary (Pen. Code, 459). Defendant contends his sentence should be modified because the trial courts sentence was unauthorized. The trial court imposed three one year prison term enhancements under section 667.5, subdivision (b), as well as two five year prior serious felony conviction enhancements under section 667, subdivision (a)(1). Two of the prison term enhancements were based on the same prior convictions as the serious felony enhancements. Defendant contends the trial court should have stricken the two one year enhancements that were based on the same prior convictions as the two five year enhancements. The People concede the error. Court agree and order these two duplicative one year enhancements stricken from defendants prison sentence.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale