Ramirez v. Eckert
Plaintiff and appellant Jamie Ramirez appeals from an order of dismissal entered following the trial courts sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend filed by defendants and respondents City of Hermosa Beach, Michael Lavin, Thomas Eckert, Steven Endom, and Thomas Bohlin. The trial court ruled that appellants first amended complaint failed to state any cause of action on the basis of allegations that appellant was not promoted by reason of his union activities and was thereafter retaliated against when he indicated he would seek redress for the failure to promote.
Court affirm in part and reverse in part. Court affirm the trial courts ruling as it pertains to the second, third and fifth causes of action, but reverse as to the first cause of action alleging a violation of Government Code section 3502.1 and the fourth cause of action alleging a violation of 42 U.S.C. section 1983 against the individual respondents.
Comments on Ramirez v. Eckert