legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Marriage of Cranston
After contested postjudgment proceedings, the court below ordered R. M. (Robert) Cranston to pay his ex-wife, Mary E. Cranston, spousal support of $3,000 per month. Robert challenges the support order on appeal. He contends that the court failed to consider, weigh, and apply the statutory factors relevant for making an award of spousal support as required under Family Code section 4320. He argues further that the court abused its discretion by failing to consider the fact that he makes monthly expenditures of approximately $1,150 on behalf of the parties adult son for his college education. Robert also argues that there were miscellaneous errors in the trial courts award of spousal support that require reversal.
Court conclude that the lower court did not abuse its discretion by making the spousal support award of $3,000 per month. Accordingly, Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale