legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Lorraina T.
In this juvenile dependency case, Tammy I., the mother of the dependent minor child Lorraina T. (Mother and Lorraina, respectively), challenges the trial courts denial of her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition and the courts termination of her parental rights. Mother asserts the court abused its discretion when it denied her section 388 request for a home of parent order to herself or alternatively, a resumption of reunification services and unmonitored visits with the minor. Mother also contends that termination of her parental rights was an error because there is insufficient evidence to support the courts finding that the minor is likely to be adopted, and because the evidence shows that termination of parental rights would be detrimental to the minor because Mother and the minor have maintained regular contact and the minor would benefit from continuing their relationship.
Our review of the record shows that Mothers contentions are completely lacking in merit. Therefore, Court affirm the decisions to deny her section 388 petition and terminate her parental rights.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale