legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Anna S.
Cheryl S. (appellant) appeals the order terminating her parental rights to her daughter, Anna S. (Anna) (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26, subd. (b)(1).) She contends the order was erroneous because her significant relationship with Anna satisfied the exception to termination, and because she received ineffective assistance from her original attorney at the earlier hearing at which reunification services and visitation were ordered terminated. The order is affirmed.



Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale