legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Hunter
A jury convicted Eddie Henry Hunter of carjacking (Pen. Code,[1] 215), two counts of second degree robbery ( 211), two counts of attempted second degree robbery ( 664/211), false imprisonment ( 236) and first degree residential robbery ( 211).
On appeal, Hunter contends there is no substantial evidence to support his conviction of first degree residential robbery. Hunter also contends CALCRIM No. 376 impermissibly allows the jury to draw an inference that the defendant is guilty of carjacking solely from his possession of the stolen car. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale