P. v. McCaslin
Appellant Patrick Keith McCaslin appeals from his conviction, following a plea of guilty to count two of the information, charging the unlawful taking of a motor vehicle. (Veh. Code, 10851, subd. (a).) His appellate counsel has raised no issues on appeal, and asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Appellant has also been informed of his right to file supplemental briefing, and he has not done so. We find no errors or other issues requiring further briefing, after our review of the entire record, and therefore affirm the judgment of conviction.
Court briefly summarize the factual and procedural history of this case as follows. On March 24, 2006, the police department of the City of Eureka received a report that a vehicle had been stolen from a parking lot at a food store. A security videotape from the store showed appellant removing the keys to the stolen vehicle from the personal effects of a store employee.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. McCaslin