legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Mitchell
Defendant pled guilty to one count of use of an access card with intent to defraud. (Pen. Code, 484g.)[1] The trial court granted defendant formal probation for a period of five years, a condition of which required defendant to pay restitution in an amount later to be determined. Defendant contends, and the People concede, that the trial court erred in extending her probation beyond the maximum permissible term due to defendants inability to pay the restitution in its entirety. Court agree and, therefore, reverse the order extending defendants probation for an additional year.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale