In re Phillip O.
Phillip O. appeals from a restitution order requiring him to pay $97,100 to burglary victims following his admission that he committed burglary and other offenses alleged in a petition under Welfare and Institutions section 602. Minor contends that the restitution determination lacks substantial evidence. He alternatively argues that the restitution hearing was fundamentally unfair because the court prevented his counsel from fully questioning the victims regarding their claimed economic loss. Court affirm.
Comments on In re Phillip O.