P. v. Nesbitt
Defendant Robert Hayden Nesbitt appeals from the denial of his motion pursuant People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 (Romero), to strike all six of his prior strike convictions for purposes of the Three Strikes law. He contends that the trial court erred in taking judicial notice of a 1991 juvenile probation report that contradicted his claim of childhood physical and psychological abuse. Court affirm the judgment, finding that defendant waived his claim of error and that, in any event, the trial court did not in fact rely on the contents of the report or abuse its discretion in denying his motion.
Comments on P. v. Nesbitt