In re R.C.
Mateo C. appeals from the order made at the six month review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.21) concerning his children. At the hearing, the juvenile court returned the children to their mother under a plan of family maintenance, transferred the dependency cases to Alameda County where the mother resides, ordered no visitation for Mateo until a psychological evaluation of him was completed, and issued a restraining order prohibiting Mateo from contacting the mother or the children, except through their social workers. On appeal, Mateo contends: (1) he was denied reasonable services; (2) the children should have been placed in his custody; (3) transferring the dependency cases to Alameda County was improper; and (4) the visitation restrictions and restraining order were improper. Court find no error and affirm the order.
Comments on In re R.C.