legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Santivanes
Defendant appeals from judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of three counts of kidnapping for carjacking, counts 1, 7 and 8 (Pen. Code, 209.5, subd. (a)), three counts of kidnapping to commit robbery, counts 2, 9 and 10 (Pen. Code, 209, subd. (b)(1)), two counts of second degree robbery, counts 4 and 5 (Pen. Code, 211) and one count of misdemeanor sexual battery, count 6 (Pen. Code, 243.4, subd. (e)(1)). On counts 1 and 7, he was sentenced to two consecutive prison terms of life with the possibility of parole. Sentence on the remaining counts was either stayed pursuant to Penal Code section 654 or ordered to run concurrently with the sentences imposed in counts 1 and 7. He contends the trial court erred when it sentenced him on counts 1 and 7 to consecutive terms based on facts not found by the jury, violating his federal constitutional rights to due process and trial by jury. For reasons explained in the opinion, Court affirm the judgment and order the abstract of judgment corrected to reflect the proper sentence.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale