legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Miller
A jury found defendant guilty of possession of cocaine base for sale in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11351.5. In a separate bench trial, the trial court found defendant suffered three serious or violent felony convictions under the three strikes law (Pen. Code, 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d), 667, subds. (b)-(i)) and had served four prior prison terms ( 667.5, subd. (b)). The trial court granted defendants Romero motion, struck two of the strike convictions, and dismissed the prior prison term enhancements. Defendant received a one strike sentence of eight years, consisting of a four-year middle term doubled.
In his timely appeal, defendant contends (1) the trial court violated his state and federal constitutional rights to counsel and a fair trial by denying his request to discharge retained counsel, and (2) defendants rights under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda) were violated when the prosecution improperly commented on defendants post-arrest silence in violation Doyle v. Ohio (1976) 426 U.S. 610 (Doyle). Court reject both contentions. The trial court acted within its discretion in denying defendants untimely request to discharge counsel, and defendant forfeited his Doyle error claim by failing to interpose a timely and specific objection below.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale