legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Nevarez
Defendant appeals from judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of possession of a firearm by a felon, count 1 (Pen. Code, 12021, subd. (a)(1)) and disobeying a domestic relations court order, a misdemeanor, count 3 (Pen. Code, 273.6, subd. (a)). The jury additionally found appellant had suffered a prior conviction of a serious or violent felony within the meaning of the Three Strikes law (Pen. Code, 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d) and 667, subds. (b)-(i)) and suffered two prior convictions and served prison terms within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b). He was sentenced to prison for a total of five years, consisting of the middle term of two years doubled pursuant to the Three Strikes law, plus one year for the prior prison term enhancement. Court have examined the entire record and are satisfied that no arguable issues exist and that appellant has, by virtue of counsels compliance with the Wende procedure and our review of the record, received adequate and effective appellate review of the judgment entered against him in this case. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 278; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 112-113.)
The judgment is affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale