legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Crouse
Defendant appeals from a judgment granting him probation after imposition of sentence was suspended, following his guilty plea to transportation of methamphetamine and possession of that drug for the purpose of sale. (See Health & Saf. Code, 11378, subd. (a), 11379, subd. (a).) On appeal, he contends this appellate court must review the sealed transcripts of the two in camera hearings conducted as part of his motions for discovery, for disclosure of informants and to suppress the evidence seized pursuant to the search warrantpart of which was sealedand determine if the denial of those motions was proper. He also contends his constitutional rights were violated when the trial court barred his counsel from attending the in camera hearings. Court disagree and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale