In re S. Q.
It was alleged in a juvenile wardship petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, 602) that appellant S. Q., a minor, committed three felonies, viz., carjacking (Pen. Code, 215, subd. (a)), vehicle theft (Veh. Code, 10851) and second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 211 & 212.5, subd. (c)), and two misdemeanors, viz., being under the influence of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, 11550, subd. (a)) and giving false information to a police officer (Pen. Code, 148.9, subd. (a)). Appellant admitted the misdemeanor allegations and, following a jurisdiction hearing, the court found the felony allegations true. Following the subsequent disposition hearing, the court adjudged appellant a ward of the court, placed her on probation and ordered her committed to the Tulare County Youth Treatment Center for a period of 45 to 180 days.
On appeal, appellant contends the court prejudicially erred in (1) refusing a defense request to recall a prosecution witness who had previously testified and been excused and (2) refusing to allow a defense investigator to testify concerning an experiment the investigator apparently conducted. Court affirm.
Comments on In re S. Q.