500 matching results for "ravimor":
From CA Unpub Decisions
Minor V.P. entered admissions to felony illegal possession of a concealed firearm by a minor (Pen. Code, § 29610),[1] misdemeanor possession of live ammunition by a minor (§ 29650), felony carrying a loaded unregistered firearm (§ 25850, subd. (c)(6)), and felony carrying a loaded concealed firearm on his person (§ 25400, subd. (c)(6)).In lieu of adjudging the minor a ward of the court, the juvenile court deferred entry of judgment(DEJ).The minor purports to appeal.
Counsel was appointed to represent the minoron appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and requesting this court to review the record and determine whether there were any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Counsel advised the minorof his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from the minor. We shall dismiss the a |
From CA Unpub Decisions
Minor V.P. entered admissions to felony illegal possession of a concealed firearm by a minor (Pen. Code, § 29610),[1] misdemeanor possession of live ammunition by a minor (§ 29650), felony carrying a loaded unregistered firearm (§ 25850, subd. (c)(6)), and felony carrying a loaded concealed firearm on his person (§ 25400, subd. (c)(6)).In lieu of adjudging the minor a ward of the court, the juvenile court deferred entry of judgment(DEJ).The minor purports to appeal.
Counsel was appointed to represent the minoron appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and requesting this court to review the record and determine whether there were any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Counsel advised the minorof his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from the minor. We shall dismiss the a |
From CA Unpub Decisions
Minor V.P. entered admissions to felony illegal possession of a concealed firearm by a minor (Pen. Code, § 29610),[1] misdemeanor possession of live ammunition by a minor (§ 29650), felony carrying a loaded unregistered firearm (§ 25850, subd. (c)(6)), and felony carrying a loaded concealed firearm on his person (§ 25400, subd. (c)(6)).In lieu of adjudging the minor a ward of the court, the juvenile court deferred entry of judgment(DEJ).The minor purports to appeal.
Counsel was appointed to represent the minoron appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and requesting this court to review the record and determine whether there were any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Counsel advised the minorof his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from the minor. We shall dismiss the a |
From CA Unpub Decisions
Minor V.P. entered admissions to felony illegal possession of a concealed firearm by a minor (Pen. Code, § 29610),[1] misdemeanor possession of live ammunition by a minor (§ 29650), felony carrying a loaded unregistered firearm (§ 25850, subd. (c)(6)), and felony carrying a loaded concealed firearm on his person (§ 25400, subd. (c)(6)).In lieu of adjudging the minor a ward of the court, the juvenile court deferred entry of judgment(DEJ).The minor purports to appeal.
Counsel was appointed to represent the minoron appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and requesting this court to review the record and determine whether there were any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Counsel advised the minorof his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from the minor. We shall dismiss the a |
From CA Unpub Decisions
Appointed counsel for defendant Jonathan Nelce Lancaster has filed an opening brief in these consolidated cases, setting forth the facts of the case and asking this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we affirm.
|
From CA Unpub Decisions
In a previous nonpublished opinion, we reversed the juvenile court’s 2015 order terminating visitation for defendant and appellant Gordon E. (Father). We reasoned it was not proper to terminate visitation without Father and his then-14-year-old daughter (Daughter) participating in at least one monitored visit. We made clear, however, that our ruling did “not prohibit the court from reevaluating visitation, based in part on Daughter’s input, after the monitored therapeutic visitation occurs.” (In re Candice E. (Jan. 7, 2016, B265130, p. 7).)
A monitored therapeutic visitation has now occurred. Following the visit, the juvenile court terminated jurisdiction and determined it would not be in Daughter’s best interest to continue visitation with Father. Nonetheless, the juvenile court ordered monthly monitored visitation in a therapeutic setting, with the caveat that Daughter did not have to go to the visits. Father appealed the orders, arguing visitation was only “illuso |
From CA Unpub Decisions
Maxwell Lee Coulson pled guilty to possession of heroin for sale. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11351, 11378.) He also admitted he suffered two prior convictions for drug related offenses. (Heath & Saf. Code, § 11370.2, subd. (c).) He further admitted that he suffered three prior felony convictions for which prison sentences were imposed. (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b).)
The trial court sentenced Coulson to the three year middle term for possession of heroin for sale. The court imposed a consecutive one year sentence for one of the prior prison term enhancements. The court struck the remaining enhancements. Coulson obtained a certificate of probable cause to appeal from his plea. He stated that his attorney failed to provide him with discovery prior to his plea, and that he was under duress to plead when he was not guilty of the charge. |
From CA Unpub Decisions
Jose Luis Navarroappeals the denial of his Proposition 36 (Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012) petition to recall his third strike indeterminate sentence of 25 years to life in prison. (Pen. Code,[1] § 1170.126.) Appellant contends the trial court erred in determining that appellant was ineligible for recall and resentencing under section 1170.126 based on the court’s factual finding that appellant was armed during the commission of the crime of possession of a firearm by a felon.[2] We disagree and affirm the denial of appellant’s petition to recall his sentence and resentence him as a second strike offender.
|
From CA Unpub Decisions
Defendant Tyesha Moore is currently serving a sentence of 21 years in state prison following her conviction in May 2015 of two counts of assault with a semiautomatic firearm (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (b)),[1] one count each of possession of a firearm by a felon (§ 29800, subd. (a)(1)) and possession of ammunition (§ 30305, subd. (a)(1)), and her admission of two prior prison terms (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). One of the prior prison terms was for a felony burglary conviction (§ 459) in April 2011.
Defendant was sentenced in June 2015. In August 2015, she filed a petition under section Proposition 47 to reduce the prior burglary conviction to a misdemeanor. Although the record is not entirely clear on the point, it appears that the conviction arose from a charge that defendant possessed a forged access card with intent to defraud. |
From CA Unpub Decisions
Christopher Condee appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction by jury on one count each of attempted first degree burglary, first degree residential robbery,first degree residential burglary, and false imprisonment by violence. (Pen.Code, §§ 664/459, 211, 459, 236.)[1] Appellant contends that his conviction for attempted burglary was not supported by substantial evidence. Appellant also contends, and respondent concedes, that the trial court should have stayed his false imprisonment sentence pursuant to section 654. Finally, appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion under People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 (Romero) to dismiss his strike. We conclude that the trial court should have stayed the false imprisonment sentence but otherwise affirm.
|
From CA Unpub Decisions
Joong-Ang Daily News appeals from a judgment which awards a total of $584,611.67 to three former employees for failure to pay overtime wages and for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy. We affirm the judgment.
FACTS Joong-Ang publishes the Korea Daily, a Korean language newspaper, in California. Plaintiffs Sun K. Byun, Hyub Choi, and Ju Hun Min worked at Joong-Ang’s printing facility in Cerritos. The printing department employed 25 to 30 people. On June 7, 2013, Plaintiffs filed three individual lawsuits against Joong-Ang for failure to provide rest periods under Labor Code section 226.7, failure to provide meal periods under Labor Code sections 512 and 226.7 and failure to pay overtime wages under Labor Code sections 510 and 1194. Three claims were added to their first amended complaints: wrongful discharge in violation of public policy, waiting time penalties under Labor Code section 203, and unfair business practices under Business and Professions Code |
From CA Unpub Decisions
Defendant, Kipley Lytel, appeals from an amended judgment following confirmation of an arbitration award. Plaintiff, Oscar D. Williams, obtained a favorable arbitration ruling against “Montecito Capital Management, LLC.” Plaintiff filed an unopposed petition to confirm the arbitration award and secured a judgment. Plaintiff attempted to enforce the judgment. Plaintiff then discovered “Montecito Capital Management, LLC” had no relationship with defendant, who had committed the wrongdoing.
Plaintiff moved to amend the judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure[1] section 187 to include defendant as a judgment debtor. Plaintiff also sought to add defendant’s company, Montecito Capital Management Group doing business as Montecito Capital Management, a sole proprietorship as a judgment debtor. Defendant asserted plaintiff could not amend the judgment because the time to correct the arbitration award had expired. Plaintiff’s motion to amend the judgment was gra |
From CA Unpub Decisions
Plaintiff Thomas D. Peterson-More appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Defendants Club Towing and Tony Calvin Edwards following a bench trial on his claim for conversion. Defendants towed and stored Plaintiff’s car, and demanded Plaintiff pay $9,180 to extinguish the lien on the car for storage fees. Defendants refused Plaintiff’s settlement offer for $2,500, and Plaintiff brought this action for conversion. The court found there was no conversion, instead concluding that Defendants had a lien for 120 days worth of storage fees on the vehicle, i.e. $6,000.
We reverse. Defendants failed to comply with Civil Code[1] section 3068.1, subdivision (b),and did not commence lien sale proceedings within 15 days of towing the car. Compliance with section 3068.1, subdivision (b) is necessary to claim a lien worth greater than 15 days of storage fees. Thus, Defendants only had a lien worth 15 days of storage fees, i.e. $750. By demanding drastically more for retu |
From CA Unpub Decisions
A jury convicted defendant, Kevin Joseph Castaneda, of 12 counts of sexual assault against 2 young children: 4 counts of sexual intercourse or sodomy with a child aged 10 or younger (Pen. Code,[1] § 288.7, subd. (a)); 4 counts of oral copulation or sexual penetration with a child aged ten or younger (§ 288.7, subd. (b)); 3 three counts of lewd or lascivious acts with a child under fourteen (§ 288, subd. (a)); and 1 count of oral copulation with a child under 14 (§ 288a, subd. (c)(1)). Defendant was infected with the human immunodeficiency virus when he committed the crimes. The jury found defendant guilty of willfully exposing another person to an infectious disease, a misdemeanor. (Health & Saf. Code, § 120290.) The jury further found true an allegation defendant committed oral copulation in violation of section 288a, subdivision (c)(1), (count 5) with knowledge he was so infected. (§ 12022.85, subd. (a).) Defendant was sentenced to state prison for 220 years to life plus
|