P. v. Blassingame
Filed 7/27/06 P. v. Blassingame CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sutter)
----
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT LEE BLASSINGAME, JR., Defendant and Appellant. | C051013 (Sup.Ct.No. CRF051767)
|
Defendant entered a negotiated plea of guilty to grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (a)) in exchange for a stipulated 16-month term, concurrent to any other term he was serving, and dismissal of the remaining count [receiving stolen property].
The court sentenced defendant to state prison accordingly, imposed a $200 restitution fine and a $200 parole revocation restitution fine, and awarded $18,700 in victim restitution. Defendant appeals.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
MORRISON , J.
We concur:
SIMS , Acting P.J.
BUTZ , J.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono lawyer directory.
Analysis and review provided by Chula Vista Real Estate Attorney.
