Filed 7/2/26 In re D.R. CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
In re D.R., a Person Coming 2d Juv. No. B343693
Under the Juvenile Court Law. Super. Ct. No. SJ0238E
(Los Angeles County)
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
D.R.,
Defendant and Appellant.
D.R. appeals from the juvenile court’s order adjudicating
him a ward of the court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions
Code section 602 after the court found appellant committed
second degree robbery. (Pen. Code, § 211.)
On the morning of November 26, 2024, Nathaniel was
riding his skateboard when four or five boys approached him.
One of the boys pointed a firearm at Nathaniel and said, “Run
your pockets.” Nathaniel did not know what to do, so the boy
pushed him to the floor, took his skateboard, and told him to
empty his pockets. Nathaniel did so, but he had only his house
keys.
Appellant put a firearm to Nathaniel’s head. After the first
boy said that he “runs the block” and that he was from “Hartland
Boys,” appellant said to hurry up because they were taking too
much time. Both appellant and the first boy put away their guns
and walked off.
Appellant testified he had never seen Nathaniel before and
knew nothing about the robbery of his skateboard.
After the court sustained the robbery allegation, appellant
admitted a Penal Code section 245, subdivision (a)(1) violation on
a separate petition. The court ordered appellant committed to
the care of probation and placement in a camp program for a
term of five to seven months.
We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal.
After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief
raising no issues. On April 10, 2026, we sent a letter advising
appellant that he had 30 days to submit any grounds for appeal,
contentions, or arguments he wished us to consider. We have
received no such submission from appellant.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that
counsel has fully complied with their responsibilities and that no
arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436,
441.) The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
CODY, J.
We concur:
YEGAN, Acting P. J. BALTODANO, J.
2
Susan Ser, Judge
Superior Court County of Los Angeles
______________________________
Courtney M. Selan, under appointment by the Court of
Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
3
