legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re G.M. CA2/6

In re G.M. CA2/6
By
02:16:2018

Filed 1/3/18 In re G.M. CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX In re G.M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. 2d Juv. B283349 (Super. Ct. No. J070971) (Ventura County) VENTURA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. M.M., Defendant and Appellant. M.M. (Father) appeals an order terminating parental rights to his daughter, G. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.) In case No. B282603, he appeals an order terminating parental rights to his son, B. B. is G.’s half brother and they are placed together with their prospective adoptive parents. In our separate opinion in case No. B282603, we conclude that notice under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA, 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) as to B. was defective but cured and that ICWA does not apply to B. Here Father contends that if B. is an Indian child, his joint placement with G. may be jeopardized, and the juvenile court should consider whether the sibling relationship exception applies. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(v).) Our decision in case No. B282603 that ICWA does not apply to B. renders these contentions moot. DISPOSITION The order is affirmed. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED. TANGEMAN, J. We concur: YEGAN, Acting P. J. PERREN, J. Tari L. Cody, Judge Superior Court County of Ventura ______________________________ John L. Dodd, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Leroy Smith, County Counsel, Alison L. Harris, Assistant County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.




Description M.M. (Father) appeals an order terminating parental rights to his daughter, G. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.) In case No. B282603, he appeals an order terminating parental rights to his son, B. B. is G.’s half brother and they are placed together with their prospective adoptive parents. In our separate opinion in case No. B282603, we conclude that notice under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA, 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) as to B. was defective but cured and that ICWA does not apply to B. Here Father contends that if B. is an Indian child, his joint placement with G. may be jeopardized, and the juvenile court should consider whether the sibling relationship exception applies. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(v).) Our decision in case No. B282603 that ICWA does not apply to B. renders these contentions moot.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 34 views. Averaging 34 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale