California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
Michele A. Douglass, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
________________________________
Kevin Furr was convicted by jury of five counts of robbery and two counts of attempted robbery, and admitted having suffered a prior felony conviction within the meaning of the â€
Description
Defendant was convicted by jury of five counts of robbery and two counts of attempted robbery, and admitted having suffered a prior felony conviction within the meaning of the "Three Strikes" law. The convictions arose from separate incidents that occurred between February 12 and March 11, 2005, during each of which defendant entered a commercial establishment and demanded money from the cashier. At sentencing, the court referred to another robbery matter (Super. Ct. L.A. County, No. KA070207) on which defendant had been sentenced to 15 years. Sentence on that matter was deemed the principal term, and consecutive sentences of 2 years (one third the middle term of 1 year, doubled under the Three Strikes law) were imposed on defendant's robbery convictions in this case, for a total of 10 years. Concurrent terms were imposed for the attempted robberies.
Court have examined the entire record and are satisfied that counsel has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 109–110; People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
