Fear Not Law Articles: In re C.W.

In re C

In re C.W.

Filed 2/22/07 In re C.W. CA2/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re C.W., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

B193369

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. CK59114)

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

BRAD W.,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT:

Appellant Brad W. appeals from an order issued at a progress hearing held on July 31, 2006, wherein the juvenile court reiterated that it had terminated jurisdiction over appellant's daughter, C. W. (referred to in this opinion as C.). Appellant also appeals from an order issued on August 1, 2006, denying his request for disability accommodation.

After examination of the record, appellant's court-appointed counsel advised this court in writing that he was unable to find any arguable issues. We thereafter notified appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any argument he wished this court to consider and that failure to do so would result in dismissal of this appeal as abandoned.

On December 30, 2006, appellant filed a letter brief wherein he refers to his â€

Description	Appellant appeals from an order issued at a progress hearing held on July 31, 2006, wherein the juvenile court reiterated that it had terminated jurisdiction over appellant's daughter, C. W. (referred to in this opinion as C.). Appellant also appeals from an order issued on August 1, 2006, denying his request for disability accommodation. After examination of the record, appellant's court appointed counsel advised this court in writing that he was unable to find any arguable issues. Court thereafter notified appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any argument he wished this court to consider and that failure to do so would result in dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. Therefore, under the holding of In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th 952, the appeal is dismissed
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.