legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Selter v. Gledhill CA4/1

NB's Membership Status

Registration Date: Dec 09, 2020
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 12:09:2020 - 10:59:08

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
Xian v. Sengupta CA1/1
McBride v. National Default Servicing Corp. CA1/1
P. v. Franklin CA1/3
Epis v. Bradley CA1/4
In re A.R. CA6

Find all listings submitted by NB
Selter v. Gledhill CA4/1
By
12:15:2020

Filed 2/6/19 Selter v. Gledhill CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER LEE SELTER, as Successor Trustee, etc.,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

FRED GLEDHILL,

Defendant and Respondent.

D074174

(Super. Ct. No. 37-2017-00015333-

CU-FR-CTL)

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Eddie C. Sturgeon, Judge. Affirmed.

Benice Law and Jeffrey S. Benice for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Daley & Heft, Lee H. Roistacher and Matthew E. Bennett for Defendant and Respondent.

Beverly Wilson Gledhill (Beverly) appeals from a postjudgment order awarding $17,120 in attorney fees and $1,114.93 in costs to Fred Gledhill (Fred) after the court granted Fred's anti-SLAPP motion.[1] In the parties' related case, Selter, as Successor Trustee, etc. v. Gledhill (Feb. 6, 2019, D073372) [nonpub. opn.], we affirmed the order granting the anti-SLAPP motion.

In this appeal, appellant concedes that if the order granting Fred's SLAPP motion is affirmed then the order awarding attorney fees and costs should also be affirmed.

DISPOSITION

The order awarding attorney fees and costs is affirmed. Respondent Fred Gledhill is entitled to costs on appeal.

NARES, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

IRION, J.


[1] Beverly died on December 9, 2017, after the filing of the notice of appeal. We have granted appellant's unopposed motion to substitute Christopher Lee Selter, successor trustee of the Gledhill-Selter Trust dated May 11, 1998, in her place.





Description Beverly Wilson Gledhill (Beverly) appeals from a postjudgment order awarding $17,120 in attorney fees and $1,114.93 in costs to Fred Gledhill (Fred) after the court granted Fred's anti-SLAPP motion. In the parties' related case, Selter, as Successor Trustee, etc. v. Gledhill (Feb. 6, 2019, D073372) [nonpub. opn.], we affirmed the order granting the anti-SLAPP motion.
In this appeal, appellant concedes that if the order granting Fred's SLAPP motion is affirmed then the order awarding attorney fees and costs should also be affirmed.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 11 views. Averaging 11 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale