legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Michael H.

In re Michael H.
10:31:2006

In re Michael H.


Filed 10/20/06 In re Michael H. CA3






NOT TO BE PUBLISHED



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT


(Sacramento)


----












In re MICHAEL H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.




THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


MICHAEL H.,


Defendant and Appellant.




C050136



(Super. Ct. No. JV117754)




Michael H., a ward of the juvenile court based upon prior sustained petitions charging arson and battery, admitted violating his probation, and was ordered placed in a group home.


We appointed counsel to represent the minor on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) The minor was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from the minor. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to the minor.


DISPOSITION


The judgment is affirmed.


ROBIE , J.


We concur:


RAYE , Acting P.J.


MORRISON , J.


Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.


Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Property line Lawyers.





Description Minor, a ward of the juvenile court based upon prior sustained petitions charging arson and battery, admitted violating his probation, and was ordered placed in a group home. Defendant appeals requesting that the court independently review the record. Court found no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to the minor. The judgment is affirmed.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale