Miller v. First American Title Ins
Filed 8/24/06 Miller v. First American Title Ins. CA2/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| JAMES B. MILLER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. | B187276 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC083618) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. James A. Bascue, Judge. Affirmed.
Schleimer & Freundlich and Joseph D. Schleimer for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Garrett & Tully, Robert Garrett, Ryan C. Squire, and Stephanie W. Tang for Defendant and Respondent.
James B. Miller, M.D. (appellant) appeals from a judgment dismissing his claims against First American Title Insurance Company (respondent) entered after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of respondent on the grounds that respondent had no duty to defend appellant against a cross-action filed against him in connection with the sale of real property in Malibu, California. We affirm.
CONTENTIONS
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in determining that respondent had no duty to defend him because: (1) certain claims in the cross-complaint filed against appellant triggered such a duty to defend; and (2) the â€
