legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Foster

P. v. Foster
08:16:2012





P












P. v. Foster













Filed 7/30/12 P. v. Foster CA2/5













>NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

>

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts
and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or
ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for
publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115>.







IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND
APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION
FIVE




>






THE PEOPLE,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



DEAUDRE FOSTER,



Defendant and Appellant.




B240510



(Los Angeles
County

Super. Ct.
No. NA090727)






APPEAL from
a judgment of the Superior Court
of href="http://www.adrservices.org/neutrals/frederick-mandabach.php">Los Angeles
County, Judith Levy Meyer, Judge. Dismissed.

Richard B.
Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Kamala D.
Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General,
Lance E. Winters, Assistant Attorney General, Steven D. Mercer, Deputy Attorney
General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant,
Deaudre Foster, purports to appeal after he pled no contest to drug charges on January 24, 2012. Sentenced on the same date, his notice of
appeal was not filed until April 12,
2012. We noted the appeal
may be untimely. We have a duty to raise
the issue of our own jurisdiction on our own motion and thus issued an order to
show cause re: dismissal. (Jennings
v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121,
126; Olson v. Cory (1983) 35 Cal.3d 390, 398.)
We appointed counsel, allowed briefing and scheduled href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.com/">oral argument solely on the dismissal
issue.

Defendant’s
notice of appeal was not timely filed.
(Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.308(a).)
It was filed more than 60 days after he was sentenced. Thus, his appeal must be dismissed. (People
v. Pritchett
(1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 190, 195.)

The appeal
is dismissed.

NOT
TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS





TURNER,
P. J.





We concur:





ARMSTRONG,
J.





KRIEGLER,
J.









Description Defendant, Deaudre Foster, purports to appeal after he pled no contest to drug charges on January 24, 2012. Sentenced on the same date, his notice of appeal was not filed until April 12, 2012. We noted the appeal may be untimely. We have a duty to raise the issue of our own jurisdiction on our own motion and thus issued an order to show cause re: dismissal. (Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126; Olson v. Cory (1983) 35 Cal.3d 390, 398.) We appointed counsel, allowed briefing and scheduled oral argument solely on the dismissal issue.
Defendant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.308(a).) It was filed more than 60 days after he was sentenced. Thus, his appeal must be dismissed. (People v. Pritchett (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 190, 195.)
The appeal is dismissed.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale