P. v. Hibshman
Filed 3/2/06 P. v. Hibshman CA1/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BOBBIE HIBSHMAN, Defendant and Appellant. | A109779 (Del Norte County Super. Ct. No. CRF0110056) |
The trial court revoked Bobbie Hibshman's probation after finding she was actively involved in the sale of fraudulent documents to be submitted to drug court. Hibshman argues the trial court's finding was not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree and affirm.
Background
On March 15, 2002, Hibshman pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to grand theft by embezzlement (Pen. Code, §§ 487, subd. (a); 503). The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Hibshman on three years formal probation; among other conditions, she was required to serve 60 days in county jail and obey all laws.
In April 2003, Hibshman admitted violating probation by driving with a suspended or revoked license and with a blood alcohol level of 0.03. The court extended her probation for two years, ordered her to serve an additional 30 days in jail, and ordered her to attend drug court and submit to drug testing.
In September 2004, the probation department petitioned for modification of Hibshman's probation based on an allegation that she had been â€
