P. v. Beltran

Filed 6/30/11 P. v. Beltran CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PACIANO DURAN BELTRAN, JR., Defendant and Appellant.

2d Crim. No. B230923 (Super. Ct. No. 2010030702) (Super. Ct. No. 2010003367) (Ventura County)

Paciano Duran Beltran, Jr. appeals the judgment of conviction following his plea in case number 2010030702 to failure to register as a sex offender with a prior conviction. (Pen. Code, § 290, subd. (b)).^[1] Appellant admitted that the prior conviction was a strike within the meaning of the Three Strikes Law (§§ 667, subds. (c)(1) & (e)(1); 1170.12, subds. (a)(1) & (c)(1)), and admitted violating probation in case number 201003367 involving a conviction for failing to register as a transient (§ 290.011, subd. (a)). The trial court sentenced appellant to 32 months state prison (16 month low term, doubled based on the prior strike) in case number 201003072, and a concurrent 16 month term in case number 2010003367. Appellant was ordered to pay a $200 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)), a $200 parole revocation fine (§1202.45) in each case.
We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel’s examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.
On May 25, 2011, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. On June 13, 2011 we received a letter from appellant stating that the sentence was "under the right guidelines."
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126.)
The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.



YEGAN, J.


We concur:



GILBERT, P.J.



PERREN, J.

Edward F.Brody, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________


California Appellate Project, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director and Richard B. Lennon, Staff Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.

---