Swank v. Walt Disney World
Filed 6/30/06 Swank v. Walt Disney World CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| NEMA SWANK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. WALT DISNEY WORLD CO., Defendant and Respondent. | G035606 (Super. Ct. No. 03CC11636) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Kazuharu Makino, Judge. Affirmed.
Lund & Caplan and Richard A. Caplan for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Gilbert, Kelly, Crowley & Jennett, James P. Spaltro and Warren S. Fujimoto for Defendant and Respondent.
While acting as a school chaperone at Disneyland Resort on â€
