legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re S.R.

In re S.R.
06:07:2011

In re S



In re S.R.





Filed 6/2/11 In re S.R. CA1/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR


In re S.R., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.


THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
S.R.,
Defendant and Appellant.





A130271

(San Francisco County
Super. Ct. No. JW106467)


S.R. (Minor) appeals after the juvenile court found he had committed assault and vandalism. He contends the finding that he committed misdemeanor assault is inconsistent with the juvenile court's other factual findings. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
A juvenile wardship petition was filed on behalf of Minor (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602), alleging he had committed felony assault with a deadly weapon, a BB gun (Pen. Code,[1] § 245, subd. (a)(1)) (count one); that he had committed felony assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)) (count two); and that he had committed vandalism on the windshield of a truck (§ 594, subd. (b)(1)) (count three).
The evidence at the contested jurisdictional hearing showed that Dustin Scudder was driving a â€




Description S.R. (Minor) appeals after the juvenile court found he had committed assault and vandalism. He contends the finding that he committed misdemeanor assault is inconsistent with the juvenile court's other factual findings. We affirm.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale