legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Tatiana C.

In re Tatiana C.
06:03:2011

In re Tatiana C


In re Tatiana C.




Filed 4/27/11 In re Tatiana C. CA4/1



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.





COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA



In re TATIANA C. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.



SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JASMINE D.,

Defendant and Appellant.

D059085


(Super. Ct. No. J516742)


APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Laura J. Birkmeyer, Judge. Dismissed.

Jasmine D. appeals the orders entered at the jurisdictional and dispositional hearing held under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Citing In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, she asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.
In In re Sade C., the California Supreme Court held review under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a judgment or order, obtained by the state, adversely affecting [her] custody of a child or [her] status as the child's parent." (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.3d at p. 959.) We therefore deny her requests to review the record for error and to address her Anders issues. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.)
Citing In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, Jasmine's counsel also asks this court to exercise its discretion to provide Jasmine the opportunity to file a supplemental brief in propria persona. The request is denied.
DISPOSITION
The appeal is dismissed.


McDONALD, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:



McINTYRE, J.



IRION, J.



Publication Courtesy of California lawyer directory.
Analysis and review provided by Escondido Property line Lawyers.
San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com




Description Jasmine D. appeals the orders entered at the jurisdictional and dispositional hearing held under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Citing In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, she asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.
In In re Sade C., the California Supreme Court held review under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a judgment or order, obtained by the state, adversely affecting [her] custody of a child or [her] status as the child's parent." (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.3d at p. 959.) We therefore deny her requests to review the record for error and to address her Anders issues. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.)
Citing In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, Jasmine's counsel also asks this court to exercise its discretion to provide Jasmine the opportunity to file a supplemental brief in propria persona. The request is denied.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale