Marriage of Goytia-Nummedal and Nummedal
Filed 10/13/10 Marriage of Goytia-Nummedal and
Nummedal CA2/7
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts
and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or
ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for
publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115
IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND
APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION
SEVEN
In re Marriage of GLORIA
GOYTIA-NUMMEDAL and KJELL NUMMEDAL.
B219710
(Los Angeles
County
Super. Ct.
No. BD246969)
GLORIA GOYTIA-NUMMEDAL,
Respondent,
v.
KJELL NUMMEDAL,
Appellant.
APPEAL from
an order of the Superior Court
of Los Angeles
County, Hank M. Goldberg, Judge. Affirmed.
Pick &
Boydston and Erik S. Syverson for Appellant.
Gloria M.
Goytia, in pro. per., for Respondent.
______________________
>
INTRODUCTION
Appellant
Kjell Nummedal (Nummedal) appeals from an order entered after a hearing on an
order to show cause filed by his former wife, respondent Gloria M. Goytia
(Goytia). On appeal, Nummedal does not
challenge those portions of the order directing him to pay child support
arrearages and his portion of his children's uninsured healthcare
expenses. He challenges only that
portion of the order pertaining to his children's custodial accounts. Specifically, Nummedal contends that (1) the
order is invalid because it was based upon a judgment's directive that was made
in excess of jurisdiction, and (2) the trial court erred prejudicially in
ruling on Goytia's order to show cause without giving him the opportunity to
present evidence. We affirm.
BACKGROUND[1]
The
parties' marriage was dissolved on October
31, 1997. The terms and
provisions of the judgment of dissolution
of marriage (entered on November 3, 1997), to which the parties stipulated,
granted them joint legal and physical custody of their then minor daughter,
Karina, and minor son, Eric, with Goytia having primary physical custody of
both children.
Per the
parties' stipulation, the judgment of dissolution further provided that they
were to be named as â€
| Description | Appellant Kjell Nummedal (Nummedal) appeals from an order entered after a hearing on an order to show cause filed by his former wife, respondent Gloria M. Goytia (Goytia). On appeal, Nummedal does not challenge those portions of the order directing him to pay child support arrearages and his portion of his children's uninsured healthcare expenses. He challenges only that portion of the order pertaining to his children's custodial accounts. Specifically, Nummedal contends that (1) the order is invalid because it was based upon a judgment's directive that was made in excess of jurisdiction, and (2) the trial court erred prejudicially in ruling on Goytia's order to show cause without giving him the opportunity to present evidence. Court affirm. |
| Rating |
