legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.M.

In re J.M.
10:02:2010



In re J








In re J.M.





























Filed 9/29/10 In re J.M. CA4/2

















NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS



California
Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF >CALIFORNIA >



FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION TWO






>










In re J.M. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court
Law.







SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY CHILDREN
AND FAMILY SERVICES,



Plaintiff
and Respondent,



v.



R.S.,



Defendant
and Appellant.








E050616



(Super.Ct.Nos.
J221619, J222622)



>OPINION






APPEAL from the Superior Court
of San
Bernardino County.
Wilfred J. Schneider, Jr., Judge.
Affirmed.

Maryann M. Milcetic, under
appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Ruth E. Stringer, County
Counsel, and Jeffrey L. Byson,
Deputy County Counsel for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant and appellant R.S.
(Mother) appeals from the termination of her parental rights as to her
10-year-old daughter J.M. and two-year-old daughter R.S.[1] Mother's sole contention on appeal is that the
juvenile court should have applied the â€




Description Defendant and appellant R.S. (Mother) appeals from the termination of her parental rights as to her 10 year old daughter J.M. and two year old daughter R.S. Mother's sole contention on appeal is that the juvenile court should have applied the â€
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale