Melchor v.
Filed 7/30/10 Melchor v. Mercy Medical Center CA1/5
California
Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST
APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION
FIVE
and Appellants,
and Respondent.
A124448
(
Super.
Jose
Melchor and Natalie Melchor, by and through their guardians ad litem, Martin
Melchor and Ramona Melchor, appeal from a judgment entered after the court
granted the summary judgment motion
of respondent Mercy Medical Center Merced.
Appellants contend a triable issue of material fact precluded summary
judgment and the court erred in denying their request for a continuance of the motion hearing. We will affirm the judgment.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In
December 2006, Jose and Natalie Melchor, through their guardians ad litem,
filed a complaint alleging professional
negligence on the part of numerous defendants, including respondent
Catholic Healthcare West dba Mercy Medical Center Merced (sued as Mercy Medical
Center and referred to hereinafter as â€
| Description | Jose Melchor and Natalie Melchor, by and through their guardians ad litem, Martin Melchor and Ramona Melchor, appeal from a judgment entered after the court granted the summary judgment motion of respondent Mercy Medical Center Merced. Appellants contend a triable issue of material fact precluded summary judgment and the court erred in denying their request for a continuance of the motion hearing. Court affirm the judgment. |
| Rating |
